Education

Memo to Merrifield on heaven & hell

By Dave Crater (crater@wilberforcecenter.org)

    “But the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.” - Revelation 21:8

    “And I say to you, My friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do. But I will show you whom you should fear: Fear Him who, after He has killed, has power to cast into hell.” - Christ, Luke 12:4-5

    “Meantime, down here it looks as if our so-called board will vote to turn over Hunt Elem[entary] to C. Chavez for a charter before the evil twins are forced out by recall!! There must be a special place in Hell for these Privatizers, Char[t]erizers, and Voucherizers! They deserve it!” - Former Colorado House Education Committee Chairman Mike Merrifield (D-Manitou Springs), email to Sen. Sue Windels 12/8/06

Rep. Merrifield is in august company: the Apostle John, exiled on the island of Patmos toward the end of the late-first century reign of the Roman emperor Domitian, and Jesus Christ. Talk of hell flows so naturally from the lips of all three.

So does the specific naming of those who stand to be so consigned. Merrifield even capitalizes the surrogate names of his condemned to emphasize their lostness.

The Apostle John, earlier in the Book of Revelation, foreshadows the writings of the Prophet Merrifield by himself forecasting the appearance of a pair who would be thought evil by their generation, but who are righteous ambassadors of God Himself (Rev. 11:10).

The implication is that the appearance of evil to their generation is a result not of the pair’s own evil, but of the evil in the hearts of the generation around them, who as a result view the uprightness of the pair with a jaundiced, unjust eye.

Why would hell occupy such a prominent place in Mr. Merrifield’s thought? The public education establishment to which he is, er, religiously committed, certainly does not teach the existence of such a place. Neither does it teach the existence of heaven.

Both, according to the secular ideology prevailing among Mr. Merrifield’s heroes and allies, are figments of the human imagination – vestiges of folklore from a less enlightened age. Human beings are, we now know, descendants via Darwin’s natural selection of a primordial single-cell organism, but they can go to hell? If so, it is incumbent on Mr. Merrifield to support the addition of robust teaching on hell to our public school curricula – the future of our children demands it. After all, they could very well grow up to be Privatizers, Charterizers, and Voucherizers, guilty of filthiness beyond any hope of forgiveness, their priceless souls lost to the sinister rebellion of those opposing the very Kingdom of God on the earth and her Faithful Stewards in the Public School System.

A particular curiosity on this score is that at least one of the “evil twins” Mr. Merrifield condemns, Mr. Eric Christen of Colorado Springs, also believes in hell. In fact, much of Mr. Christen’s energy while a member of the District 11 School Board in Colorado Springs was devoted to restoring at least a vestige of spiritual context to a public education district that costs residents of the city upward of $300 million a year and delivers test scores among the lowest in the state. Mr. Christen suggested that a little less attention to secular fads and power politics in education and a little more attention to the ancient idea that we humans and our children are spirits, living life on a short and precarious precipice between good and evil, time and eternity, heaven and hell, might better inform and deepen the whole project.

Oh, and the idea that we humans and our children are spirits also means that the state and its public schools are not the only legitimate stewards of education.

Mr. Merrifield opposes this agenda with, er, religious zeal, even consigning Mr. Christen to hell for supporting it. One can imagine the weeping and gnashing of teeth that would have arisen in Mr. Merrifield’s circle of acquaintances, and in the larger political and media class, had Mr. Christen suggested that Mr. Merrifield and Co. have helped turn the latest generation of public school children into unbelieving murderers (Columbine) who are more and more sexually immoral with each passing year (teen pregnancy, abortion, and STDs), dabble not uncommonly in occult spirituality (sorcery), and who easily become accomplished in lying to parents, teachers, and anyone else in legitimate authority over them. Had he said this, we can be certain Mr. Christen would have cemented his already-advanced condemnation beyond even the faintest hope of salvation.

Mr. Merrifield is the worst kind of hypocrite. He uses secular theory and secular language in public to advocate a thoroughly secular education for children under the stewardship of a thoroughly secular education establishment, but uses the most severe religious language in private and when caught, contends in his own defense that he never meant that language to become public.

The episode ought to be instructive for all those who authentically entertain deep convictions about heaven and hell, and who have read the Apocalypse with real understanding. When Christ said elsewhere, “Judge not, and you shall not be judged. Condemn not, and you shall not be condemned,” He was not, as we are so often told by the political left today, contradicting His own teaching on hell and who would end up there, or contending that just judgment between good and evil, wisdom and folly, is not the prerogative of humankind. On the contrary, He was warning us to be on the alert for, and to avoid being like, those who condemn while they themselves do things worthy of condemnation.

Dave Crater is President and Chairman of the Wilberforce Center for Colorado Statesmanship

Radio, April 1: A place in hell?

Join us on radio every Sunday, 5-8pm on 710 KNUS, DenverTo listen online from anywhere, click 710knus.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Theocracy alert, take cover! The top Democrats making education policy at the Colorado General Assembly say there is "a special place in hell" for supporters of charter schools and parental choice. That's according to an email from Rep. Mike Merrifield, House Education chairman, to Senate Education chairman Sue Windels, disclosed this week by the new website FacetheState.com. (Oops, late-breaking news and correction: Make that former Chairman Merrifield, since he quit the post in disgrace on Friday.)

Besides the uncaring attitude Merrifield betrays toward ill-served schoolchildren, we should be shocked at the fundamentalist overtones in this exchange between two supposedly respectable liberals. And the diversion of taxpayer resources into a religious expression -- at that fatal moment when Windels began reading the message on her official state email account -- horrors!

The hell talk smacks of jihad. No doubt these powerful committee chairs, pronouncing secret curses on their infidel enemies, also hope for a heaven where 72 educrats await every martyr to the NEA faith. The ACLU with its atheist censors would certainly not approve.

We at Backbone Radio don't approve either, not one bit. State Sen. Nancy Spence, R-Centennial, will be my guest on Sunday for a report on this year's Dem offensive against all the school-reform gains of the past decade. I urge you to listen -- listen or else, as Mike Merrifield might put it.

** Also, David Kopel of the Independence Institute will discuss the huge recent victory for gun rights in the DC Court of Appeals. And I'll talk with John Zakhem, attorney for those Colorado voters who lost a redistricting appeal in the US Supreme Court.

** And there's more. Hilmar von Campe, author and conservative organizer who survived Nazism, returns to the show. So does Mike Littwin of the Rocky Mountain News, back from his travels covering the 2008 presidential race.

So join us from 5-8pm this Sunday, when my own startling conversion to Hillary for President will also be a hot topic. Our special April 1 show (get it?) is one you won't want to miss.

Yours for self-government,

JOHN ANDREWS

Report shatters teacher pay myth

By Krista Kafer (krista555@msn.com) “Who, on average, is better paid -- public school teachers or architects? How about teachers or economists?” asks a Jan. 30 oped piece in the Wall Street Journal.

The answer isn’t one you’d expect. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, public school teachers earn 36% more per hour than the average white-collar worker. The authors of the article, Jay Greene and Marcus Winters, released a study “How Much Are Public School Teachers Paid?” taking aim at the enduring myth that teachers are underpaid.

Highlights from the study include:

** According to the BLS, the average public school teacher in the United States earned $34.06 per hour in 2005.

** The average public school teacher was paid 36% more per hour than the average non-sales white-collar worker and 11% more than the average professional specialty and technical worker.

** Full-time public school teachers work on average 36.5 hours per week during weeks that they are working. By comparison, white-collar workers (excluding sales) work 39.4 hours, and professional specialty and technical workers work 39.0 hours per week. Private school teachers work 38.3 hours per week.

** Compared with public school teachers, editors and reporters earn 24% less; architects, 11% less; psychologists, 9% less; chemists, 5% less; mechanical engineers, 6% less; and economists, 1% less.

** Compared with public school teachers, airplane pilots earn 186% more; physicians, 80% more; lawyers, 49% more; nuclear engineers, 17% more; actuaries, 9% more; and physicists, 3% more.

** Public school teachers are paid 61% more per hour than private school teachers, on average nationwide.

The irony is that while teachers as a group are not underpaid, many teachers as individuals are underpaid. Public school teachers are generally compensated according to a standard schedule that rewards seniority and education. On such a schedule, a teacher on probation and a “Teacher of the Year” with the same education and time in service will make the same amount of money.

How fair is that? Neither the teacher nor the taxpayer is well served under such a system.

Schools shouldn't be shooter-safe zones

By Dave Petteys (dpetteys@comcast.net) At least the shooter in Wednesday's Bailey high school tragedy was a homeless white man; think of all the victim language from liberals had it been otherwise.

But as for what to do now: Government officials will bump the gun control laws pertaining to schools up to probably 75 different regulations (from 70) and congratulate themselves for “finally doing something about the menace of firearms” until something like this happens again.

No one bothers to ask why the first 70 laws didn't protect the innocent teen who was killed. Had there been an armed teacher on the scene, proficient in the use of firearms, the story might have been different.

I have a Concealed Carry Permit, and I asked the Arapahoe Community College Police Dept, where I am an adjunct instructor, about carrying weapons on school property. “PROHIBITED!” was the officer’s immediate response. “Why is that?” I queried. “We want to be assured we’re the only ones armed on campus” he said.

Is this not the grand delusion of gun control laws? Short of airport-style security checks, the only assurance the officer can have is that he is the only law abiding citizen on campus that’s armed, no more. Evildoers with malicious intent do not fall in this category. Would not our schools be safer from such malcontents, criminals and terrorists if the laws did not make our schools “shooter-safe zones?”

Ref C waste is 'nothing to sniff at'

Let’s take a trip back in our time machine to last fall’s election season (I know, we haven’t even managed to get through this one but bear with me) and recall the arguments used to support Referendum C – the state’s largest tax hike ever. One of the prevailing arguments, that prompted former Senator Hank Brown to beg for our votes in a television commercial, was that if we didn’t pass the tax increase it would be devastating to higher education. And it worked! On November 1, 2005, 52% of the voters passed Ref C hoping that the money would be spent wisely and higher education would be "safe." If you’re curious as to how part of your tax increase is being spent, don’t miss this article in the Denver Post: “Holistic science studies are nothing to sniff at.”

One of the pictures accompanying the article shows a student blissfully sniffing a bottle of, well, something. In the article you’ll learn that one of Metropolitan State College of Denver’s brand new majors is “integrative therapeutic practices” which teaches students to sniff things like “tangerine oil” and practice Reiki, “which involves channeling energy into someone’s body.” Students will also receive instruction on how to make herbal teas and salves.

That's your tax dollars at work, folks.