Politics

Limit the Judges targets 2008

All Colorado judges would be limited to three terms of four years each, beginning in 2010, under a constitutional amendment proposed by a citizens group hoping to qualify it by petition for the 2008 ballot. Limit the Judges, a campaign committee headed by former Senate President John Andrews, took the first step today toward getting its proposal approved by the Secretary of State so signature-gathering can begin.

Andrews led last year's unsuccessful campaign for Amendment 40, which would have placed a "ten years and out" limit on state Supreme Court justices and Appeals Court judges, including incumbents. He said the revised plan differs in applying uniformly to judges all levels, raising the limit to 12 years, and excluding incumbents.

"This approach could have won in 2006," Andrews said, "especially the provisions taking in district judges and avoiding retroactivity. We expect it will be a winner in 2008, building on more than half a million votes that we received from people who agree our courts lack accountability."

"Colorado still needs judicial reform, even though it was blocked last year by a campaign of distortion from self-interested lawyers and judges," he added. "Judges too often legislate from the bench, and we keep seeing examples of individuals with virtual lifetime appointments whose character is deficient."

Andrews noted that while judges in this state face periodic retention elections and aren't appointed for life, they enjoy a retention rate of over 99% under the current judicial performance review system, which he called "toothless."

He said his organization, Limit the Judges, is recruiting local leaders and beginning to fundraise toward a campaign goal of $2 million.

Truth serum for Gore's visit

Rushing the season on Halloween, former VP Al Gore brings his "Inconvenient Truth" fright night tour to Denver this evening. Props to the unnamed Denver Post writer who took the extra effort to balance yesterday's and today's stories on the event by citing the "Convenient Fiction" rebuttal film produced by Steven Hayward of the American Enterprise Institute. Here is the link for Hayward's thoughtful and carefully documented film.

While we're at it, here is a valuable booklet from the Heartland Institute, "Scientific Consensus on Global Warming."

And here is an excellent full-length treatment by Dennis Avery and Fred Singer, one of those books where the title says it all (or at least says volumes), "Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1500 Years."

If you happen to attend tonight, watch out for those Arctic refugee hordes that have been reported migrating into Colorado -- polar bears, penguins, and the occasional Eskimo, all headed for the high cool up on St. Mary's Glacier by way of the 16th Street Mall.

[Cross-posted from the Gang of Four blog on PoliticsWest.com]

A closer look at the Jena affair

When a gang of “chip on their shoulders” black youth terrorize and beat white kids, it’s called an “expression of ethnic identity”. But if the white kids band together for protection, it’s called “racist white supremacy.” As shown by this Snopes.com fact check of the Jena affair, the assumed direct linkage of the noose incident and the beatings omits significant intervening events.

The biggest racists in this whole mess are Jesse Jackson and Rev Al Sharpton. The foundational outrage in all of this is the Progressive theological notion that “only the dominant group can be racist”, which is utter nonsense. Either we strive for Martin Luther King’s color blind society or we do not.

The reverse discrimination to “undo the years of discrimination” is fraudulent. And there is no mechanism to turn it off, no way to measure when enough is enough. It is conferring perks and privilege on the basis of skin color, which has fragmented our nation into warring racial and ethnic groups. Diversity is not our strength! It is a source of weakening, division, and conflict. But then, weakening America has always been the Progressive agenda.

Our forefathers realized that in order to build unity they had to leave religious denomination off the table. So must we now concerning race and ethnicity. We enjoy our rights and liberties on an individual basis, not on the basis of our race. We need to eliminate the 3 pages of racial group check boxes we find now on every government application.

The racist agitators such as Jackson and Sharpton need to be shamed, ostracized, put out of business, and recognized as the hypocrites they are.

As yet, no one's the One

"Nixon's the One," brags a faded 1968 campaign poster in the political museum that is my basement. Scoffers mocked the boast, but he turned out to be the one, vindicating my vote for him that year (the first I ever cast) and making possible my later service on his White House staff. Talking by chance today with two friends from that era, Raymond Price of New York and Clark Durant of Detroit, I got to comparing 2008 with 1968. That sense of logical inevitability, of the right fit between the man and the times, which Nixon's self-assured slogan ultimately put across to party faithful and voters at large, so far has not come close to settling upon any of this year's Republican hopefuls.

The widespread GOP preference for none of the above is what fueled the Fred Thompson boom -- now losing its boominess, it seems to me -- and what may still lure Newt Gingrich into the race. His American Solutions webcast starts today at 5pm MDT. It can be viewed online at AmericanSolutions.com, or on Channel 219 of the DISH Network and Channel 577 of Direct TV.

The conservative commentariat is talking up his flirtation with a candidacy in pieces like this one by Matt Lewis or this one by Cal Thomas. A little matter of $30 million in pledges now seems to be the fulcrum of decision for Newt.

Of course, inevitability is more often clear with hindsight. In fall 1967, Nixon's name was just one of a dozen being bandied in Republican circles. Others plausibly bidding to be "the One" included Reagan and Rockefeller (an eventual president and VP) as well as George Romney, Mitt's dad. Gingrich, historian that he is, must be heartened by remembering how much baggage Nixon was able to overcome -- high negatives and well-publicized defeats.

While nominations are settled earlier now than they were 40 years ago, September of the odd year is still not quite the 11th hour. Lots can still happen. In comparison with the Broncos watching time expire a couple of Sundays ago in Buffalo, or the Rockies left for dead earlier this month, it remains way-way early for all the Republican contenders, announced and unannounced.

[Cross-posted on PoliticsWest.com]

Lamborn among the Lilliputians

Congressman Doug Lamborn (R-CO5) couldn’t have known when he first waded into Colorado politics over a decade ago that he would wash ashore on Lilliput. Such seems to be the case, however. As you remember, Jonathan Swift created two fictional islands in his 1726 classic, Gulliver’s Travels, Lilliput and Blefuscu. No disproof having been established, one assumes that both islands are, still today, located in the South Indian Ocean, separated by a channel 800 yards in width, and inhabited by people “not six inches high.” More to the point for the purpose of current politics: When a shipwrecked and still asleep Lemuel Gulliver washed up on the shores of Lilliput and was captured by little people who tied him down before he awoke, he discovered that the two islands were permanently at war over the correct way to eat a boiled egg. Still today, the inhabitants of Blefuscu are firmly convinced the correct way to eat a boiled egg is to start at the rounded end. The Lilliputians are equally convicted that, still today, no civilized person eats a boiled egg any way except sharp end first.

Though Gulliver is a giant compared to the Lilliputians, he does not return their hostility in kind, but rather helps to aid them in various ways before, for no other reason than his refusal to take part in their selfish perfidies, he again earns their fickle and shallow scorn.

Naïve people here in Colorado sometimes refer to Lilliput as the El Paso County Republican Party, but we really should get into the habit of calling places and people by their proper names. The little people in Lilliput are particularly active these days, doing their best to tie up Congressman Gulliver -- er, Lamborn -- before he permanently awakes and takes to himself for many years to come the title of Congressman, a title which the Lilliputians believe rightfully belongs only to a Lilliputian.

The chief Lilliputians in Lilliput these days are one Mr. Jeff Crank and one retired General Bentley Rayburn. To be sure, both are accomplished men by Lilliputian standards; indeed, they appear to know it. Gulliver is equally accomplished and, refreshingly, doesn’t appear to know it. More to the point, by the standards that Gulliver considers genuinely meaningful and which are in truth the only things that can turn a Lilliputian into a Giant -- old-fashioned notions that include courageous loyalty to true principles and good men above one’s personal ambitions, and doing the right thing and telling the truth even when it’s not popular, and doing it for a long time -- it appears Gulliver is, still today, as lonely as he was in 1726.

The Leading Lilliputians are currently squabbling over who is justified in taking on Gulliver in a primary next year. One says it is properly he because -- well, that’s never been entirely clear. Part of it must be a result of his having come so close to beating Gulliver two years ago. As for the rest of it -- well, perhaps he eats the round end of the egg first.

The other Leading Lilliputian and his Supporting Lilliputians say he’s a general, and thus a true leader. The question as to why a true leader would challenge an incumbent Giant like Gulliver -- remember, a Giant is not necessarily someone who is popular, but someone who does what is right and tells the truth, and has for a long time -- does not appear to have yet been posed in Lilliput.

To cap things off, if a newspaper article on Sept 19 was any indication, it appears the Leading Lilliputians are so hostile to Gulliver that they may have overcome their own mutual antipathies long enough to make something of a Gentle-Lilliputian’s agreement: if either is behind in the polls close to election day, that one will drop out of the race. “There is no formal agreement,” mind you – personal interests are not to be sacrificed until it’s clear there is really nothing to be sacrificed and fulfillment of spite toward Gulliver becomes the only remaining objective. “It’s not going to be my ego that causes [Gulliver] to get re-elected,” one Lilliputian said.

The next day, the other Lilliputian’s supporters were again assaulting both his rival and Gulliver for only the vaguest of reasons: “[Gulliver] was not a leader in the (state) legislature, and he won’t be in Washington,” one said. “And [the opposing Lilliputian] has nothing to set him aside, nothing of stature.” Translation: we don’t like Gulliver and the other Lilliputian eats his boiled eggs pointed end first.

So what does our modern-day congressional Gulliver do amidst these Lilliputians? What Gulliver has always done. “[Gulliver’s] campaign said they had no comment,” the latter story reports. He faithfully continues his accustomed course in the world and in the halls of national government, praying for the welfare of the Lilliputians even in their spite toward him. It’s safe to assume Gulliver realizes life and politics in Lilliput are, still today, fickle, and not likely to change any time soon.