Shift of priorities for 2008 ballot
Friday, May 2nd, 2008Term limits for judges won’t have enough petition signatures to make the 2008 ballot, proponents announced, vowing to push for other conservative initiatives instead . (more…)
Term limits for judges won’t have enough petition signatures to make the 2008 ballot, proponents announced, vowing to push for other conservative initiatives instead . (more…)
“Cops lie: Don’t trust cops!” was the theme for an hour-long training session for would-be protesters at the Democratic National Convention, held in Denver on April 14 (more…)
“During good behavior” is the constitutional standard for a federal judge to continue serving. Sen. Ken Salazar has wondered publicly (more…)
How does an advocate for judicial reform gain a hearing from the frowning skeptics he’s sure to meet in the pages of a lawyers’ magazine? (more…)
Author: The Watcher
John Andrews says he will try again with judicial term limits, which this writer called a 5% solution last year. In reply, let me lay out the (more…)
Newspapers have reported on a Justice Department celebration of the recent grievous injustice its prosecutors perpetrated (more…)
All Colorado judges would be limited to three terms of four years each, beginning in 2010, under a constitutional amendment proposed (more…)
When a gang of “chip on their shoulders” black youth terrorize and beat white kids, it’s called an “expression of ethnic identity”. (more…)
“Let justice run down like water, and righteousness like a mighty stream.” (more…)
“Also I will make justice the measuring line,” we read in Isaiah after sadly reading the headlines, (more…)
Former Colorado Sen. President John Andrews, the proponent of last year’s costly and contentious “Limit The Judges” proposal to place term limits on the state’s top judges, isn’t wavering in his efforts, Law Week Colorado found during a recent interview. (more…)
By Karen Kataline (kaykat73@aol.com)
I know it’s a stinky subject but the recent acquittal of Kathleen Ensz, of a criminal charge, for filling a political mailer with dog feces and returning it to Marilyn Musgrave’s office, got me thinking. Underneath the sheer entertainment value of reporting on the extent of political “dung-slinging” lies a profoundly serious issue. Ensz was acquitted on the grounds of free speech. But what exactly does that mean nowadays? We are living in a time when words are increasingly punished and seen as “violence” — while actions, which used to be the only thing punishable by the courts, are now defined as speech and protected accordingly. (more…)
The long legal battle over our 2003 bill to draw permanent congressional districts ended Monday when the US Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of four Colorado voters seeking redress under Article I, Section 4 of the US Constitution.
The Denver Post gloated editorially that this “high-handed and illegal” action of the General Assembly has at last been disposed of. Presumably written by Bob Ewegen, who has had a four-year mad against yours truly about this issue, the editorial did me the honor of personal responsibility for the disputed legislation. (more…)
(Denver Post, Feb. 18) “Ninety-nine and 44/100 percent pure.” Remember the old Ivory Soap slogan? It made the sensible point that if you start with a really clean cleaning agent, everything else will clean up better as a result.
Squeaky clean is certainly what Coloradans want with our judges, entrusted as they are with interpreting the laws, punishing wrongdoers, and dispensing justice. So you will be glad to learn that by one yardstick, voter approval, state judges are better than 99 percent perfect. It sounds improbable, but the statistic is easy to calculate.
In nine elections since the judicial performance review system began in 1988, over a thousand judges have faced the voters for retention or dismissal. Fewer than one percent were dismissed (seven, to be exact). Only 13 were even recommended as “do not retain” by the sweetheart-minded performance commissions. Be my Valentine, your honor? (more…)
The 18th Judicial District DA, censured this week by a state regulatory panel, sent the following letter to newspaper editors in response to what many of us believe was grossly slanted coverage of the whole matter. - JA
By District Attorney Carol Chambers (cchambers@da18.state.co.us)
Dear Editors: When I took office, I made a commitment to do the right thing, the principled thing in any given situation. I took this job because I wanted to improve a criminal justice system in need of a great deal more accountability to our constituents for the things that we do and the money that we spend. Our judges, deputy district attorneys and public defenders are public servants first and foremost and should conduct themselves accordingly. It is my job as the District Attorney to represent the People of the state of Colorado and I never forget that.
Identity theft is rampant in the state of Colorado. We rank 5th in the nation for identity theft related crime. District attorneys along with law enforcement must promptly and aggressively investigate this crime and assist victims whenever they can. (more…)